Violence Won't Work in the U.S.

I'm opposed to any political violence in the U.S. for several reasons, chief among them being that that any such deed would backfire in a major way. Anyone who engages in violence will immediately attract negative media attention to their cause. In fact, there is a real risk that the opposition could frame a movement by pretending to carry out violent acts in its name.

These Cleveland anarchists simply provided fodder for the right wing and justified the salaries of the agents of our enormous security apparatus.

It is also a fact, an indisputable fact, that the security apparatus by and large operates in general adherence to a set of rules put in place by the political authority, and that these rules make sufficient allowance for human rights. A few pepper-spraying incidents here and there do not constitute a police state, nor does the busting up of a couple medical marijuana collectives, lamentable though these cases may be.

Although there may be various injustices and indignities perpetrated against minorities or the working class, that has always been the case throughout history, as anyone who has studied history knows. I have to wonder whether the Cleveland anarchists ever cracked open a history book. There are many cases in history where political violence has backfired or failed to achieve any worthwhile objective, and a few cases where political violence has succeeded in some degree, but those cases tend to be ones where there is already widespread popular support for the objectives behind the political violence.

I would endorse political violence in Iran and Syria, and possibly a few other countries in the world that I haven't heard much about. In China, although the authorities are far more corrupt and there is less regard for human rights, there is also a real risk of violence backfiring against the perpetrators. There may be cases in China where political violence is justified, but not in every instance.

We are blessed in the U.S. with a system that is amenable to gradual change. It may not work very well in all cases, but when and where does a governmental system work very well in all cases? I think the current system is probably better than the system of a hundred years ago, and the American system is certainly better than that in Malaysia or China. I think that if anyone feels like political violence is the answer, they should move over to China and see what life is like in that country, before leaping to any ill-founded conclusion about their own country.

I think that some men have a real problem with a cycle of hatred and brooding that gets out of hand, in part because they tend to associate with others that reinforce that manner of thinking. It is very important to associate with people that are good and to avoid the company of fools and people that are filled with negative emotions. Good people exert a powerfully positive influence upon the mind, and their company is a gift in itself, in many ways superior to therapy or medication.